Method of work
From precise diagnosis to an individual interpretation
The first step is to recognise what is genuinely holding the performer back: the absence of a clear pulse, awkward coordination, tension, uncertainty of intonation, a lack of harmonic understanding, or perhaps no conception of the intended sound. Only then does an exercise become purposeful.
Edyta draws on experience acquired at the piano, harpsichord and organ, in vocal ensembles and through her work as an accompanist. This makes it possible to view a problem simultaneously from the perspective of technique, style, voice and the entire construction of the work.
The same difficulty can have different causes. An uneven passage does not always result from insufficient finger technique — it may originate in unclear voice-leading, accidental fingering, a lack of breath between phrases or a tempo at which the performer ceases to hear the direction of the music. Instead of repeatedly playing the whole work, Edyta isolates the particular mechanism and selects an exercise that addresses the actual problem.
Understanding the nature of the instrument is equally important. The piano allows dynamics to be shaped through weight and the speed of attack; the harpsichord requires particular control of articulation, time and relationships between voices; while the organ teaches thinking in a long line, through registration and the acoustics of the space. Experience of these different ways of producing sound helps Edyta avoid applying one solution mechanically to every repertoire.
A technical correction is always reconnected with musical meaning. Fingering should support phrasing, articulation should arise from the character of the motif and style, and tempo should allow the harmony, rhythm and formal tension to be heard. In polyphonic music, independence of voices becomes particularly important: the performer should know not only which note to play, but where each line is going and what function it serves within the entire texture.
Edyta has worked with children, adults, singers and ensembles, and can therefore adapt her language of explanation and the pace of progress without lowering artistic standards. One performer may be helped by precise harmonic analysis, another by a demonstration of a more comfortable gesture, and another by finding the breath and proper character of a phrase together. The method remains flexible, but the aim is constant: a conscious, free and stylistically convincing performance.
The final stage is therefore not the flawless repetition of a teacher’s instruction. It is the ability to listen independently, identify the cause of a difficulty and make decisions that can be justified through the score, style and one’s own aural imagination. An individual interpretation then grows from knowledge and attentiveness rather than from an accidental effect.